iGoogle: The hompage you have when you don't have a homepage

I don't have too much to say about iGoogle other than it's just another example of how Web 2 is all about taking web resources out of the hands of the tech heads, and allowing the rest of us to do our thing. You want to fill a web page with all the stuff you like? Try I Google.

Googling Maps and Docs

I'd love to see usage statistics of these two Google products. I suspect that Google Maps gets a lot of use while Docs not so much. Google maps seems to me to be the perfect internet product. It takes advantage of the internet's multimedia capabilities, it provides access to far more material that any competing format, there are few privacy issues, and most importantly everyone will find it useful at some point. It's one of my favourite web products.

Docs on the other hand is markedly inferior to its offline competitors in regards to its functionality, and perhaps most crucially there's the privacy issue. Who is going to trust their business reports, latest novel or memoirs to Google when pc based word processors and spreadsheets are so easy to come by? Still, it wouldn't be the first time I've been wrong.

Let's go Wiki now everybody's learning how

Does anyone remember the days when if you had managed to put something up on the web, or programme a VCR, you were considered quite clever. Those were they days!

Wikies

Years ago I went to a conference and I heard a New Zealand man talk about Wikipedia. Having missed the start of the talk, I assumed that a Wiki was some kind of Kiwi thing like Wirinaki. It was ages before I discovered my mistake.
I think the humble wiki is one of those web 2 tools that (unlike many of the others) is likely to last. After all it serves that simple function that Tim Berners-Lee intended for the original html web. That is easy, low tech, online information sharing.
Most of the Wikis I have seen haven't been pretty (our own Libnet included), but they sure are functional. Allowing a lot of web writers to get on with the real work.

Technorati: Little Letters to Everyone

So it's time to blog about Technorati: the international capital of blogs! Well I could say it has a lot of blogs. I could also comment on those listed as the most popular. I was certainly surprised by what people are reading. The blend of popular culture and techno talk must certainly say something about 21st century society. More interesting though is the way most blogs are written. As I read the thing that strikes me most is not the content but the tone. Nobody writes a personal letter these days, but I think the tradition has been reborn in the personal blog. As I skip from one blog to the next (especially those that aren’t technology oriented), I can't help but notice the personal style in which they are written. To me they are like little letters to everyone. It seems to be a very human thing to want to write down your thoughts and send them to someone. Does it make us feel more connected? Or is it just a way of getting something off your chest? I think that probably depends on whether you are an introvert or an extravert. Who knows? What does this blog say about me? What I am sure of is that something new may also be something old.

del.icio.us

Hmm del.icio.us.

Social bookmarks?
So long as you lead as well as follow then I can see how this can work. The danger is that you become lazy and only follow the paths laid down by others.

Portable bookmarks?
This is the really useful bit. But where do you store the bookmark for del.icio.us ?

Google Books

As long as it remains free I think Google Books is a great force for good. Hopefully this will continue to be the case considering Google’s mantra about doing no evil (was the China debate ever settled?). I read with interest how Google has made peace with the publishers, and as far as I can see, it has been a thumping victory for the laws of copyright. Thank God for that! I know the naughty boys and girls of the internet find copyright the most annoying legal right in the history of annoying legal rights. But ultimately if the creative types don't get paid for each copy that is made of their work, then they just won't bother anymore. There is more than enough out of copyright and copyright free material to still make this a wonderful resource.

As a history tragic Google Books gives me access to unbelievable material. I only wish I had the time to explore it properly. I know we have noble sites free of the commercial taint, such as Project Gutenberg. However they are never going to be able to match the resources of a profit making venture like Google. Let’s just hope that Google is happy is settle for its advertising and promotional revenue, and the subscription word is never uttered across the boardroom table.